Is routine implant removal necessary after open reduction internal fixation of Lisfranc injuries? Comparing functional outcomes of routine and on-demand removal: A multicenter study
Injury. 2025 Mar 4;56(4):112240. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112240. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lisfranc joint injuries are a severe cause of disruption of foot stability and function, often requiring surgical intervention such as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The necessity of routine implant removal after healing remains controversial. This study aimed to compare functional recovery and postoperative complications among patients undergoing routine, on-demand, or no implant removal following ORIF for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 188 patients treated with ORIF for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations. Patients were divided into three groups: routine removal (RR), on-demand removal (ODR), and no removal (NR). Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score at the final follow-up. Complications were categorized as implant-related or post-removal. AOFAS midfoot scores and complication rates were compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: The median AOFAS midfoot scores at the final follow-up were 92 (IQR 83.00-95.00) in the RR group, 95 (IQR 85.00-95.00) in the ODR group, and 95 (IQR 82.00-95.00) in the NR group, with no significant differences among the three groups (p > 0.05). Implant-related complications were comparable across the groups, although irritation was significantly more frequent in the ODR group (42.9 %) than in the RR (24.4 %) and NR (11.9 %) groups (p = 0.013). Post-removal complications occurred in two cases in the RR group, including one case of loss of correction requiring reoperation.
CONCLUSION: Routine implant removal did not show superior outcomes in functional recovery or complication rates compared to selective removal or retention. Implant retention or selective removal based on individual needs minimizes complications and optimizes patient outcomes.
PMID:40088550 | DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2025.112240